Doom Index
Get the weekly report
Doom Index / p(doom)

The p(doom) leaderboard

What the people building, studying and funding AI say are the odds it ends in catastrophe. Self-stated numbers only, ranges kept as ranges, every row linked to its source and backed by a quote.

Median
38%
21 experts · 22 verified
Highest
99.999999%
Roman Yampolskiy
Lowest
≈0%
Yann LeCun
Index weight
25%
score 75/100
#Person0%25%50%75%100%p(doom)

Wording checked against the primary source = wording checked against the primary source (post, article or transcript) on Oct 21, 2026, with the supporting quote on each profile. Definitions differ: some speakers mean extinction, others “very bad outcomes”, and time horizons are often unstated. Bars show the stated range and the dot marks its midpoint, which is what the index uses. Statements that aren't probabilities are shown but left out of the median.

Surveys & groups

Groupp(doom)DateSource
AI researchers (2,778 surveyed)5%Jan 2024AI Impacts, Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI
AI safety researchers (44 surveyed)30%Jun 2021Rob Bensinger, Existential risk from AI survey results
Superforecasters (XPT)0.38%Jul 2023Forecasting Research Institute, Existential Risk Persuasion Tournament

Shown for context; not included in the index median.

The Weekly Doom Report · free

One email every Monday. Every number sourced.

What moved the index, the week's rogue-AI incidents, and who changed their p(doom). Five minutes, no hype.

  • The score, its drivers and the week's biggest market moves
  • New alignment incidents, with sources
  • p(doom) changes and the Global Market Fear reading
Free, via beehiiv. Unsubscribe anytime. Form not loading? Subscribe on beehiiv.